Explanatory dialogues with argumentative faculties over inconsistent knowledge bases
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Explanatory dialogues with argumentative faculties over inconsistent knowledge bases
We introduce a formal model of explanatory dialogue called EDS. We extend this model by including argumentation capacities to facilitate knowledge acquisition in inconsistent knowledge bases. To prove the relevance of such model we provide the dalek (DiALectical Explanation in Knowledge-bases) framework that implements this model. We show the usefulness of the framework on a real-world applicat...
متن کاملArgumentative inference in uncertain and inconsistent knowledge bases
This paper presents and discusses several methods for reasoning from inconsistent knowledge bases. A so-called argumentative-consequence relation, taking into account the existence of consistent arguments in favor of a conclusion and the absence of consistent arguments in favor of its contrary, is particularly investigated. Flat knowledge bases, i.e. without any priority between their elements,...
متن کاملArgumentative Logics: Reasoning with Classically Inconsistent Information
Classical logic has many appealing features for knowledge representation and reasoning. But unfortunately it is awed when reasoning about inconsistent information, since anything follows from a classical inconsistency. This problem is addressed by introducing the notions of \argument" and of \acceptability" of an argument. These notions are used to introduce the concept of \argumentative struct...
متن کاملUpdating inconsistent Description Logic knowledge bases
Finding an appropriate semantics for task of updating an inconsistent knowledge base is a challenging problem. In this paper, we consider knowledge bases expressed in Description Logics, and focus on ABox inconsistencies, i.e., the case where the TBox is consistent, but the whole knowledge base is not. Our first contribution is the definition of a new semantics for updating an inconsistent Desc...
متن کاملReasoning in Inconsistent Stratified Knowledge Bases
This paper proposes a discussion of inconsistency-tolerant consequence relations in prioritized knowledge bases. These inference techniques extend methods for reasoning from inconsistent, non-stratified, knowledge bases to the case where priorities between formulas are available. Priorities between formulas are handled in the framework of possibility theory and allow for the use of pieces of in...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Expert Systems with Applications
سال: 2017
ISSN: 0957-4174
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2017.03.009